Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

127 F.2d 297

Docket Nos. 9278, 9279.

Van Cleve v. Hauptman

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1942.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1942-03-18

5 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1942-03-18

¶1Philip S. Ehrlich, Albert A. Axelrod, and Julien R. Bauer, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

¶2Sterling Carr, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Hauptman.

¶3Chickering & Gregory, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees Detroit Trust Co. et al.

¶4Sidney M. Ehrman and Albert M. Monaco, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Wells Fargo Bank.

¶5Ira S. Lillick and Allan E. Charles, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Bondholders’ Committee of Northern Redwood Lumber Co.

¶6Before GARRECHT and HANEY, Circuit Judges.

¶7PER CURIAM.

¶8On stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal in each of above causes dismissed without costs to any party, *298that a decree of dismissal be filed in each cause, and mandate of this court in each cause issue forthwith.

/127/f2d/297 · .json · Public domain