Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 F.2d 729 - Fox v. Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc.

Fox v. Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

127 F.2d 729 · 1942

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
10
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 21 district · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Arnstein v. Porter (1946), Ramsouer v. Midland Valley R. (1943)

28 federal appellate · 21 district · 29 state decisions — followed in 10 states

25019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sena v. American Turquoise Co. · William Bradley v. The Washington Alexandria and Georgetown Steam Packet Company · Crimmins & Peirce Co. v. Kidder Peabody Acceptance Corp. · Bogart v. George K. Porter Co. · Hugh Harten v. Ernst Loffler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There was conflict concerning interpretation of the facts and the ultimate conclusion to be drawn from them * * *. But there was none as to the facts themselves. In other words, the evidentiary facts were not substantially in dispute. * * * Conflict concerning the ultimate and decisive conclusion to be drawn from undisputed facts does not prevent rendition of a summary judgment, when that conclusion is one to be drawn by the court. The court had before it all the facts which formal trial would have produced. Going through the motions of trial would have been futile.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “no genuine issue as to any material facts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.