Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
127 F.2d 780 · 1942
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2005
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kountze v. Omaha Hotel Co. · Pease v. Rathbun-Jones Engineering Co. · Magnum Import Co. v. Coty · Jerome v. McCarter · Harris v. Barber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * the effect of the specific language in the bond to which exception is taken was merely to make explicit what would otherwise have been implicit, under the circumstances of the case, if the precise language of the statute had been used with nothing more.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“* * * which said damages and costs shall include the principal amount of the judgment heretofore recovered as aforesaid in the sum of $8,500, together with all interest and costs which have heretofore or may hereafter accrue thereon.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“for all damages and costs which the other party may sustain by reason of the stay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.