Hannan v. Charness’s Empirical Analysis
127 F.2d 894 · 1942
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2008 · most notably Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey Bank (1988), Cochise College Park Inc Hall v. Perry B-72-393 Phx Wpc (1983)
9 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Horton v. Moore · Stein v. Leibowitt · Elbinger v. Capitol & Teutonia Co. · In re Weintrob · Setzkorn v. Admil, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[B]ankruptcy law imposes upon one seeking its benefits the positive duty to schedule for the benefit of creditors all his interest and property rights.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ * * * Such conditions are that the party seeking the revocation be not guilty of laches; that the application be filed within one year after the discharge has been granted, and that the knowledge of the fraud has been acquired subsequent to the date of the discharge.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Leach
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.