Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

127 F.3d 1106

Docket No. 97-15224.

Sixth v. State

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Oct. 27, 1997. Submitted Oct. 20, 1997.**

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1997-10-27

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2000

1 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Steven J. Terrall v. Deborah K. Fowler

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-10-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California James Ware, District Judge, Presiding

Before THOMPSON, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

¶1

MEMORANDUM*

¶2

Anna Sixth appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. In her amended complaint, Sixth alleged civil rights violations arising from a state court action filed against her as a result of her involvement in a traffic accident. we have reviewed the record and affirm for the reasons set forth by the district court in its order dismissing the case, filed on December 19, 1996.

¶3

AFFIRMED.

…

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4. Accordingly, Sixth's request for oral argument is denied

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

/127/f3d/1106 · .json · Public domain