Concerned Citizens of Cohocton Valley, Inc. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s Empirical Analysis
127 F.3d 201 · 1997
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Spielman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (2003), Fleet Bank, National Ass'n v. Burke (1998)
17 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California · Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. · Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor · Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because standing to appeal is conferred only on parties `aggrieved' by the judgment, a party generally does not have standing to appeal when the judgment terminates the case in his favor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if a court grants the ultimate relief a party requested, even though on grounds other than those urged by the prevailing party, that party is generally not 'aggrieved' by the judgment and may not appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Ashley v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals (In re DES Litigation), 7 F.3d 20 , 23 (2d Cir.1993) (hereinafter”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sheldon v. PHH Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.