Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 F.3d 619 - Gonzalez v. DeTella

Gonzalez v. DeTella’s Empirical Analysis

127 F.3d 619 · 1997

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
February 2009
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Estelle v. McGuire · Lindh v. Murphy · Old Chief v. United States · Gomez v. Ahitow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “admission of “gruesome” photos of the decedent in a murder case does not justify collateral relief, even when the evidence is cumulative and likely designed more to inflame the jury than to supply an essential underpinning of the prosecution’s case. Photographs of the decedent’s body are relevant. They tend to show that the crime charged by the indictment took place. Graphic depictions of multiple bullet wounds also may be relevant: they can (and here did) support the prosecution’s other evidence about how the crime occurred... .Although these facts were adduced in a more sedate fashion through the testimony of a pathologist, no rule of law, and certainly no rule of constitutional law, limits the prosecutor to one piece of evidence in support of each element of the offense. This is so even when the element is uncontested' — -indeed, even when the defendant offers to admit the element....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “limits the prosecutor to one piece of evidence in support of each element of the offense . . . even when the element is uncontested--indeed, even when the defendant offers to admit the element.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “all things considered the trial posed an unacceptably great risk of convicting an innocent person, and the judicial process therefore denied the accused due process of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.