Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

127 F. App'x 99

Head v. Williamson

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 8, 2005

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-04-08

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2005-04-08

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Joseph Marion Head, Jr., appeals the order of the magistrate judge denying Head’s “Motion for Rehearing and etc. Relief and Release” and his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and conclude that there was no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Head v. Williamson, No. CA-03-63 (S.D.W. Va. filed Oct. 21, 2004; entered Oct. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for judgment of acquittal and for “10 zillion dollars” is denied.

¶2 AFFIRMED

/127/fappx/99 · .json · Public domain