Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 FSUPP 144 - Husseyni v. Rappaport

Husseyni v. Rappaport’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 1965
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 95A

Relies on Rochester & Charlotte Turnpike Road Co. v. Paviour · Fehr v. Campbell · Haller v. Workingmen's Co-operative Bank · Pennington County Bank v. First State Bank · St. Paul Gaslight Co. v. Village of Sandstone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A holder in due course is a holder who has taken the instrument under the following conditions: “(1) That it is complete and regular upon its face; ■ “(2) That he became the .holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice that it had been previously dishonored, if such was the fact; “ (3 ) That he took it in good faith and for value; “(4) That at the time it was negotiated to him he had no notice of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.