Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 FSUPP 232 - Bohnen v. Harrison

Bohnen v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 1959
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 812

Relies on United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co. · Real Estate - Land Title & Trust Co. v. United States · Daniels v. Allen · United States v. Chicago Golf Club · Van Dyke v. Kuhl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A deduction for attorneys’ fees incurred in contesting an asserted deficiency or in prosecuting a claim for refund should be claimed at the time such deficiency is contested or such refund claim is prosecuted. A deduction for such fees shall not be denied, and the sufficiency of a claim for refund shall not be questioned, solely by reason of the fact that the amount of the fees to be paid was not established at the time that the right to the deduction was claimed.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““At the time that it became necessary for the plaintiffs to prosecute their refund claim, they included in their complaint a prayer for the tax benefit resulting from the deduction from the gross estate of the attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with such prosecution. This is all that the statute and the regulations require. “* * * Clearly a claim for attorneys’ fees need not be set forth in a claim for refund where they are not the essence of the claim but may arise only collaterally in the subsequent prosecution of the claim.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must set forth in detail and under oath each ground upon which a refund is claimed, and facts sufficient to apprise the Commissioner of the exact basis thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.