Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 Ga. App. 690 - Upshaw v. Cooper

127 Ga. App. 690 - Upshaw v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
May 2002
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2002

20 state decisions

901972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 100 Ga. App. 316 - Redd v. Peters · Cutter-Tower Co. v. Clements

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No matter how erroneous the ruling might have been (and we express no opinion on this question), a litigant cannot submit to a ruling, acquiesce in the ruling, and still complain of same. He is required to stand his ground and fight in order to successfully enumerate as error an erroneous ruling by the trial judge. Acquiescence completely deprives him of the right to complain further; he has agreed that the trial court's ruling was correct by submitting to it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.