Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 Haw. 157 - State v. Tierney

State v. Tierney’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2021
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Dusky v. United States · Drope v. Missouri · Spencer v. Kemna · Indiana v. Edwards

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although [a defendant's prison] term has been served, the results of the conviction may persist. Subsequent convictions may carry heavier penalties; civil rights may be affected. As the power to remedy an invalid sentence exists, a defendant is entitled to an opportunity to attempt to show that his conviction was invalid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[c]riminal convictions have collateral consequences even after sentences have been served.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.