Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

127 Ill. App. 333

Knight v. Collings

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 8, 1906

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1906-06-08

<p>1. Affirmance pro forma—when will be ordered. Where the abstract filed by the appellant is manifestly unfair and defective, an affirmance pro forma will be ordered.</p>

Affirmed · Decided 1906-06-08

Per Curiam.

¶1Counsel for appellee direct our attention to the abstract of the record filed by appellant in this case. An examination of such abstract discloses that the evidence favorable to appellant is set out in full by questions and answers, as it appears in the record, and that much of the evidence favorable to appellee is entirely omitted. We find it impossible to consider and determine the questions attempted to be raised, by reference to the abstract, and are not disposed to go to the record in search of matter required by the rules of this court to appear in the abstract.

¶2The abstract is so far unfair and defective that it cannot be supplemented by a further abstract, such as is contemplated by the rules to be furnished by the appellee or defendant in error.

¶3For want of an abstract in compliance with the rules, the judgment is affirmed.

¶4Affirmed.

/127/illapp/333 · .json · Public domain