Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 Ill. App. 3d 279 - Coduti v. Hellwig

127 Ill. App. 3d 279 - Coduti v. Hellwig’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2014

17 state decisions

901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 274

Relies on 37 Ill. 2d 352 - Schulenburg v. Signatrol, Inc. · 73 Ill. 2d 100 - Greene v. City of Chicago · 111 Ill. App. 3d 751 - Graham v. Mimms · 19 Ill. 2d 268 - Shlensky v. South Parkway Building Corp. · 20 Ill. 2d 208 - Gidwitz v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2)(a) In a proceeding by a shareholder if it is established that: (i) The directors are deadlocked in the management of the corporate affairs, the shareholders are unable to break the deadlock, and irreparable injury to the corporation is threatened or being suffered or the business and affairs of the corporation can no longer be conducted to the advantage of the shareholders generally because of the deadlock; (ii) The directors or those in control of the corporation have acted, are acting, or will act in a manner that is illegal, oppressive, or fraudulent; (iii) The shareholders are deadlocked in voting power and have failed, for a period that includes at least two consecutive annual meeting dates, to elect successors to directors whose terms have expired; or”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] review of the case law discloses no single act which, by itself, will be deemed oppressive without consideration of the surrounding circumstances.” (Coduti v. Hellwig (1984), 127 Ill. App. 3d 279, 284 .) In Notzke v. The Art Gallery, Inc. (1980), 84 Ill. App. 3d 294 , the court found that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “own personal interests at the expense of corporate interests.” (Coduti v. Hellwig (1984), 127 Ill. App. 3d 279, 292 .) Furthermore, a fiduciary”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.