Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 IND 306 - State ex rel. Egan v. Wolever

State ex rel. Egan v. Wolever’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
7
states following
December 1991
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently December 1991 · most notably O'Brien v. People ex rel. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co. (1905), McCoy v. Able (1892)

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 42 state decisions

10018911900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burkett v. Holman · Jackson v. Smith · Lange v. . Benedict · Yates v. Lansing · Center Township v. Board of Commissioners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No man is fitted to act as judge if he has not the courage to act in accordance with conscientious convictions of right and without fear of consequences to himself. Learning, conscience and courage are all essential qualities for those whose duty it is to decide upon the rights of their fellows.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The civil responsibility of the judge would often be an incentive to dishonest, instead of honest judgments, and would invite him to consult public opinion and public prejudices when he ought to be wholly above and uninfluenced by them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.