127 Ind. App. 443 - Harrell v. Harrell’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Rule 2-17 (e) of the Supreme Court has been in force and effect for the past several years. The rule is well settled that where an appellant has not substantially complied with such rule, the appellee need not supply the omissions, but may rely on the court to enforce the rule. Snow v. State (1954), 234 Ind. 234, 236 , 125 N. E. 2d 802 , and cases cited therein. “Where, as in the case at bar, the appellant’s brief does not comply with Rule 2-17 (e), the penalty is an affirmance of the judgment rather than a dismissal of the appeal. Peltz v. State (1953), 232 Ind. 518 , 112 N. E. 2d 853 ; Witte v. Witte (1953), 123 Ind. App. 644 , 113 N. E. 2d 166 ; Public Service Commission v. Indiana Bell Tel. Co. (1952); 232 Ind. 332 , 108 N. E. 2d 889 ; Mendenhall v. Mendenhall (1955), 125 Ind. App. 519 , 124 N. E. 2d 873 .” '”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Parsley v. Koch

2. ““The rules of procedure as defined by the Supreme Court of this state have the force and effect of law and are binding upon the litigants and this court alike.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 138 Ind. App. 84 - Loper v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY