State v. Sanders’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1953
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Ball · State v. Pratt · State v. Robinson · State v. Peterson · Docking v. National Surety Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . It lias repeatedly been held that any use of the funds of an estate or .other trust fund by ’the custodian thereof in willful, violation of his duties pertaining thereto, which prevents the fund from being immediately forthcoming on lawful demand therefor, constitutes embezzlement on the part of such custodian, and it is immaterial whether the custodian’s relationship to the fund be that of executor, administrator, trustee, or other functionary. (State v. Pratt, 114 Kan. 660 , 220 Pac. 505 ; State v. Robinson, 125 Kan. 365 , 263 Pac. 1081 ; Docking v. National Surety Co., 122 Kan. 235, 237, 238 , 252 Pac. 201 , and citations.)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Evans““The legislative mandate concerning technicalities in criminal appeals (R. S. 62-1718) is accorded much greater respect nowadays.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hathaway
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.