Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 KAN 811 - Baker v. Craig

Baker v. Craig’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
December 1970
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1970

8 state decisions

20192919301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rodman v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. · Jacobs v. Greening · Emanuel Home v. Bergin · Algeo v. Algeo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The allegations do not show any demand or attempt to get possession of them during that period.” (Baker v. Craig, 127 Kan. 811, 816 , 275 Pac. 216 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.