Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 KAN 840 - Correll v. Vance

Correll v. Vance’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 1954
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 1954

14 state decisions

601929193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Proctor v. Dicklow · Holden v. Spier · Hudson v. Barratt · Keith v. Guthrie · Kothman v. Markson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In matters pertaining to the distribution of a decedent’s estate the probate court has exclusive jurisdiction subject to appeal to the district court.” (Syl. ¶ 1.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.