127 Md. App. 758 - Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
43 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dorsey v. State · Holm v. United States · Anderson v. United States · Dufour v. Mississippi · MacK v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e say for the benefit of trial judges generally that the wise course of action is to give instructions in the form, where applicable, of our Maryland Pattern Jury Instructions. Those instructions have been put together by a group of distinguished judges and lawyers who almost amount to a “Who’s Who” of the Maryland Bench and Bar. Many of these instructions have been passed upon by our appellate courts.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he Maryland Rules `are not guides to the practice of law but precise rubrics established to promote the orderly and efficient administration of justice and... are to be read and followed.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.