Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

127 Misc. 603

Brambir v. Seifert

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1926-06-26

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1926-06-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2016

7 state decisions

401926193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1We cannot assume that the 1924 amendment of section 1425 of the Civil Practice Act (added by Laws of 1921, chap. 199, as amd. by Laws of 1924, chap. 514), providing for judgment for rent, was intended, contrary to well-established principles, to warrant the entry of judgment for rent against a tenant not personally served with the precept or who had not appeared in the proceeding. .

¶2Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

¶3All concur; present, Bijur, O’Malley and Levy, JJ.

/127/misc/603 · .json · Public domain