Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 N.C. 474 - Bailey v. Bailey.

Bailey v. Bailey.’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
June 1961
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1961

10 state decisions

201900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No separation is hinted at, even, and the matter seems to have been purely a business transaction in reference to the property owned by each of the parties to the instrument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.