Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 N.C. App. 102 - Maynor v. Onslow County

127 N.C. App. 102 - Maynor v. Onslow County’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Connally v. General Construction Co. · Thornhill v. Alabama · City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. · Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc. · Booker v. Everhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is clear from the County Commission’s resolution that the Ordinance was not intended to restrict any communication or protected speech or to deny adults access to the distributors of sexually oriented entertainment. The Ordinance is an attempt to regulate the location and the access to these materials. “The mere fact that the commercial exploitation of material protected by the First Amendment is subject to zoning and other licensing requirements is not a sufficient reason for invalidating [an] ordinance[ ].” Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc., 427 U.S. 50, 62 , 96 S.Ct. 2440, 2448 , 49 L.Ed.2d 310, 321 , reh’g denied, 429 U.S. 873 , 97 S.Ct. 191 , 50 L.Ed.2d 155 (1976). It is within the constitutional powers of a county or municipality to adopt regulations which limit the areas in which adult entertainment establishments may operate. D.G. Restaurant Corp. v. City of Myrtle Beach, 953 F.2d 140, 145 (4th Cir. 1991); Young, 427 U.S. 50 , 96 S.Ct. 2440 , 49 L.Ed.2d 310 ; City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 , 106 S.Ct. 925 , 89 L.Ed.2d 29 , reh’g denied, 475 U.S. 1132 , 106 S.Ct. 1663 , 90 L.Ed.2d 205 (1986).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[c]ounties may enact ordinances regulating land use in two fashions: one, pursuant to a comprehensive zoning plan, N.C. Gen.Stat. § 153A-341 (1991), and two, pursuant to their police powers, N.C. Gen.Stat. § 153A-121 (1991).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] county may by ordinance define, regulate, prohibit, or abate acts, omissions, or conditions detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of its citizens.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.