Landreth v. Malik’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

39 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[W]hether a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction 'can be raised by the parties at any time, or sua sponte by a court of review, and cannot be conferred by the parties.”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 78 - SANCHEZ (HUGO) v. STATE · FREDIANELLI VS. MARTINEZ

2. “[I]f the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the judgment is rendered void.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. KLABACKA VS. NELSON C/W 66772 · SUPERPUMPER, INC. VS. LEONARD

3. “should not take advantage of the lawyer by causing any default or dismissal to be entered without first inquiring about the opposing lawyer's intention to proceed); NRCP 55(c) (providing that the district court may set aside an entry of default upon a showing of good cause). However, the record suggests that the district court clerk filed the entry of default as required under NRCP 55(a) because appellant failed to defend "and that fact [was] made to appear by affidavit or otherwise.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Pope Vs. Fellhauer