State v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1 district · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State v. Lewis (1987), Moore v. State (2005)
1 district · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ake v. Oklahoma · Barrett v. United States · United States v. Mazurie · Massler v. United States · Little v. Streater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““a defendant must demonstrate by reference to the facts and circumstances of his particular case that the assistance he seeks is necessary ‘to insure effective preparation of [his] defense by [his] attorneys.’ . . . [Necessity may be found if the [witness] would advise or testify on a matter directly in issue.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fecteau“The analyses of probable value and risk must necessarily focus on the relationship between the subject of the expert services and the issues in the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dowdy v. Com.“the risk of an erroneous deprivation of ... liberty [ ] is ... slight”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dowdy v. Com.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.