Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 N.J.L. 97 - State v. Pruser

State v. Pruser’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 1974
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 1974

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

501941195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Halsted v. State · Cutter v. State · State v. Fay · State v. Atti · Wilentz v. Galvin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As, however, it is a postulate of penal laws that they should be obeyed, it is a condition of those laws that ignorance of' them should be no defense to an indictment for the violation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.