Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 N.M. 334 - State v. Rios

State v. Rios’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2020

20 state decisions

1201999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morissette v. United States · United States v. Bailey · State v. Apodaca · State v. Ogden · State v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the defendant acted under unlawful and imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury, (2) the defendant did not find [herself] in a position that compelled [her] to violate the law due to [her] own recklessness, (3) [the defendant] had no reasonable legal alternative, and (4) [the defendant's] illegal conduct was directly caused by the threat of harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “(1) the defendant committed the crime under threat, (2) the defendant feared immediate [great] bodily harm to [herself] or others if [she] failed to commit the crime, and (3) a reasonable person in the defendant's position would have acted in the same way under the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “without vitiating the protectionary purpose of the strict liability statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.