State v. Dick’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6 district · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably State v. Barrera (2001), State v. Smith (2001)
6 district · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151
Relies on United States v. Kagama · Williams v. United States · United States v. McGowan · United States v. Sam Pelican · Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) all land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States Government, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent, and, including rights-of-way running through the reservation, (b) all dependent Indian communities within the borders of the United States ..., and (c) all Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-of-way running through the same.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Frank · State v. Frank“the nature of the area in question, the relationship of the inhabitants in the area to Indian tribes and to the federal government, and the established practice of government agencies toward the area”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Frank“defer to the [district] court's determinations of fact if such findings are supported by substantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Frank
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.