Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 N.M. 504 - State v. Barr

State v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably State v. Bernal (2006), State v. Gallegos (2011)

75 state decisions

4601999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whalen v. United States · Bell v. United States · Swafford v. State · Herron v. State · State v. Gonzales

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Contributing to the delinquency of a minor consists of any person committing any act or omitting the performance of any duty, which act or omission causes or tends to cause or encourage the delinquency of any person under the age of eighteen years. Whoever commits contributing to the delinquency of a minor is guilty of a fourth degree felony.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “(1) temporal proximity of the acts; (2) location of the victim(s) during each act; (3) existence of an intervening event; (4) sequencing of acts; (5) defendant's intent as evidenced by his conduct and utterances; and (6) the number of victims.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “`multiple victims will likely give rise to multiple offenses[,]'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.