Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 Okla. 197 - Binkley v. Ball

Binkley v. Ball’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1965
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on International Harvester Co. v. Lawyer · Western Silo Co. v. Cousins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The detriment caused by the breach of a warranty of the fitness of an article of personal property for a particular purpose, is deemed to be that which is defined in the last section, together with a fair compensation for the loss incurred by an effort in good faith to use it for such purpose.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The detriment caused by the breach of a warranty of the quality of personal property is deemed to be the excess, if any, of the value which the property would have had, at the time to which the warranty referred, if it had been complied with, over its actual value at that time.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.