127 Or. App. 76 - State v. Millar’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 294 Or. App. 102 - State v. Saunders

2. “The proper inquiry in determining a question of logical relevance is whether the item of evidence even slightly increases or decreases the probability of the existence of any material fact in issue.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 294 Or. App. 102 - State v. Saunders

3. “evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 294 Or. App. 102 - State v. Saunders