Roberts v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2013
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vincent v. Bullock · Goldsmith v. McCoy · Frost Lumber Industries, Inc. v. Union Power Co. · Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co. · White v. Hodges
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The specific identification of the parties designated in the agreement as “mineral owners.” (2) The specific description of the several tracts comprising the unit. (3) The identification of the servitudes bearing on the several tracts. (4) Specific, clear and concise acknowledgment of the right of the person whose title the debtor or possessor prescribes adequately describing the property to which it applies. (5) A sufficient identification of the servitude as to which acknowledgment is sought to be made. 127 So.2d at 372 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.