Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 SO3D 292 - Clark v. State

Clark v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blockburger v. United States · Bailey v. United States · United States v. Dixon · United States v. Gaudin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appropriate remedies for a sequestration violation include prospectively excluding the witness where prejudice will otherwise ensue; striking the testimony where connivance gave rise to the testimony; [or] striking the testimony where the prejudice arose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Exclusion of the testimony is a 'serious sanction,' and appropriate only where probable prejudice would result to the other party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Failure to comply with a sequestration order does not automatically render the witness's testimony inadmissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.