Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 SO3D 417 - Fox v. Arnold

Fox v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nunn v. Baker · Wallace v. TEE JAYS MFG. CO., INC. · Cjl v. Mwb · 716 So. 2d 224 - Singleton v. Graham · 842 So. 2d 679 - Farmer v. Farmer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' M.B.L. v. G.G.L. , 1 So.3d 1048 , 1050 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008) (quoting S.B.U. v. D.G.B. , 913 So.2d 452 , 455 (Ala. Civ. App. 2005), quoting in turn C.J.L. v. M.W.B. , 868 So.2d 451 , 453 (Ala. Civ. App. 2003) ).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.