127 So. 3d 76 - State v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Yates v. Evatt · San Vicente Medical Partners, Ltd. v. Orr · Vidrio-Aleman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A challenge for cause should be granted, even when a prospective juror declares his ability to remain impartial, if the juror's responses as a whole reveal facts from which bias, prejudice or inability to render judgment according to law may be reasonably implied.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.