Baker v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga County Board · Bechtel v. Rose in and for Maricopa County · In Re Interest of Kayle C. · State ex rel. Choctaw County District Attorney v. Anderson · Winn v. First Bank of Irvington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to intervene in an action (a) when a statute confers an unconditional right to intervene, or (b) when the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede the applicant’s ability to protect’ that' interest, unless that interest is adequately represented by existing parties. (Emphasis added)”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. A. H. v. W. R. L. · Carter v. Smith“[u]pon removal of a child from the child's home, placement shall be ... [s]elected according to the least restrictive appropriate placement available, as required by 620.090(2)....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) If, after completion of the temporary removal hearing, the court finds there are reasonable grounds to believe the child is dependent, neglected or abused, the court shall issue an order for temporary removal and shall grant temporary custody to the cabinet or other appropriate person or agency. Preference shall be given to available and qualified relatives of the child considering the wishes of the parent or other person exercising custodial control ' or supervision, if known.... (2) In placing a child under an order of temporary custody, the cabinet or its designee shall use the least restrictive appropriate placement available. Preference shall be given to available and qualified relatives of the child considering the wishes of the parent or other person exercising custodial control or supervision, if known. The child may also be placed in a facility or program operated or approved by the cabinet, including a foster home, or any other appropriate available placement....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.