Primm v. Isaac’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
8
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · California v. Green · Ware v. State · 672 So. 2d 517 - Elkins v. Syken · 357 Pa. Super. 173 - Mohn v. Hahnemann Medical College & Hospital
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No intellectually honest argument can be made that . . . activities as a defense expert are not relevant for impeachment for bias.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.