Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 U.S. 579 - Brown v. District of Columbia

Brown v. District of Columbia’s Empirical Analysis

127 U.S. 579 · 1888

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
August 1975
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1975 · most notably United States v. Ballin (1892), District of Columbia v. Woodbury (1890)

11 federal appellate · 25 state decisions — followed in 12 states

1001888189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barnes v. District of Columbia · Gould v. Evansville and Crawfordsville Rr Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “And, as a general rule, it may be stated that not only where the corporate power •resides in a select body, as a city council, but where it has been delegated to a committee or to agents, then, in the absence of special provisions otherwise, a minority of the select body, or of the committee or agents, are powerless to bind the majority or do any valid act. If all the members of the select body or committee, or if all the agents are assembled, or if all have been duly notified, and the minority refuse or neglect to meet with the.others, a majority of those present may act, provided those present constitute a majority of the whole number. In other words, in such case, a major part of the whole is necessary to constitute a quorum, and a majority of the quorum may act. If the major'part withdraw so as to leave no quorum, the power of the minority to ac-t is; in general, considered to cease.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.