¶1The defendant suffered conviction on a criminal charge and appeals here, raising hut one question; that is, that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict against him. While the evidence (as in all cases where a defense is interposed) is conflicting, there is ample on the part of the state, if believed, to justify the submission of the case to the jury and for the jury to have returned the verdict which it did. Affirmed.
127 Wash. 693
State v. Williams
Decided November 7, 1923
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1923-11-07
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1925
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1923-11-07
View the full empirical analysis of this case →