127 Wash. App. 746 - State v. Cromwell’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(d) Stimulants. Unless specifically excepted or unless listed in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any quantity of the following substances having a stimulant effect on the central nervous system: (1) Amphetamine, its salts, optical isomers, and salts of its optical isomers; (2) Methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, and salts of its isomers; . . . .”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Cromwell · State v. Evans

2. “the Legislature intended to penalize the possession with intent to deliver ... of ... methamphetamine in any form more harshly than the possession with intent and delivery of any other controlled substances listed in the Schedules”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Evans

3. “that they had been charged with crimes involving methamphetamine, but the proof was limited to salts of methamphetamine, a substance they argued was treated differently in the relevant statutes.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Cromwell