Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 WIS 193 - Brown v. State

Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
19
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably 42 Cal. 3d 284 - People v. Barnes (1986), 175 Wis. 2d 653 - State v. Echols (1993)

41 state decisions — followed in 19 states

901906191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woodward v. Leavitt · State ex rel. Durner v. Huegin · Hempton v. State · Cornell v. State · Wolfgram v. Town of Schoepke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Not only must there be entire absence of mental consent or assent, but there must be the most vehement exercise of every physical means or faculty within the woman’s power to resist the penetration of her person, and this must be shown to persist until the offense is consummated. We need not mention the exception where the power of resistance is overcome by unconsciousness, threats or exhaustion. . . . Further, it is settled in this state that no> mere general statements of the prosecutrix, involving her conclusions, that she did her utmost and the like, will suffice to establish this essential fact, but she must relate the very acts done, in order that the jury and the court may judge whether any were omitted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The court shall, in every stage of an action, disregard any error or defect in the pleadings or proceedings which shall not affect the substantial rights of the adverse party; and no judgment shall be reversed or affected by reason of such error or defect.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.