127 Wis. 2d 310 - Bartel v. Carey’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently October 2012 · most notably 155 Wis. 2d 737 - Just v. Land Reclamation Ltd. (1990), 211 Wis. 2d 224 - Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests, Inc. (1997)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wis. 2d 529 - Ball v. District No. 4, Area Board · 113 Wis. 2d 112 - In Re Cherokee Park Plat · 67 Wis. 2d 130 - Garriguenc v. Love · 71 Wis. 2d 408 - Lawver v. Boling · 41 Wis. 2d 261 - National Amusement Co. v. Department of Revenue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a policy may not be construed to bind the insurer to a risk which it did not contemplate and for which it received no premium.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(e.g. self-employed cooks, gardeners, and janitors)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“was transporting its musical equipment to an engagement when the trailer containing the equipment became detached from the van pulling it. The plaintiffs husband was killed in the ensuing accident. The band member who had attached the trailer to the van was insured under a homeowner's policy with a business pursuits exclusion and an exception identical to the one at issue here. The plaintiff argued that the exception applied and the accident should be covered because the act of hitching a trailer to a van is so common to everyday life that it must be viewed as an”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.