Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 127 Wis. 2d 364 - State v. Mahone

127 Wis. 2d 364 - State v. Mahone’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
October 2004
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 2004

21 state decisions

100198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Vitek v. Jones · O'Connor v. Donaldson · Jackson v. Indiana · Finch v. Connor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) an initial hearing to justify detention pending a final commitment hearing; (2) written notice of the claimed violation; (3) disclosure of the evidence against the subject; (4) an opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (5) the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (6) a neutral and detached hearing body, and (7) a written statement by the fact-finder(s) as to the evidence relied upon and reasons for revocation of the conditional discharge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]f . . . the court determines after a hearing that the conditions of release have not been fulfilled and that the safety of the person or the safety of others requires that his or her conditional release be revoked, the court shall immediately order the person recommitted to the department . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “may construe constitutionally deficient statutes to include constitutionally required provisions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.