127 Wis. 2d 401 - State v. Bauer’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Porter v. DiBlasio (1996), 143 Wis. 2d 624 - State v. Peck (1988)
3 federal appellate · 31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Cardwell v. Lewis · Liotta v. National Forge Co. · Desist v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the owner or custodian is unknown and cannot with reasonable effort be ascertained, or does not within 5 days after notice redeem the animal by paying the expenses incurred, it may be treated as a stray and dealt with as such.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Exigent standard test applies to situations involving mistreatment of animals.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Dicesare v. Stout · State v. Stone“Any law enforcement officer may remove, shelter and care for any animal found to be cruelly exposed to the weather, starved or denied adequate water, neglected [or] abandoned .... In all cases the owner, if known, shall be immediately notified and such officer, or other person, having possession of the animal shall have a lien thereon for its care, keeping and medical attention and the expense of notice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.