¶1.Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), rendered November 9, 1984, convicting him of assault in the first degree, riot in the second degree, and discrimination (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
¶2Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
¶3The evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to prove the defendant’s guilt of the crimes of which he was convicted beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Musial, 120 AD2d 682; People v Bauer, 113 AD2d 543). Specifically, with respect to the assault, there was ample evidence that the defendant acted in concert with his codefendants.
¶4The defendant’s contention that the court erred in failing to give the jury a circumstantial evidence instruction is unpreserved, and, in any event, without merit. A circumstantial evidence charge is required only when the People’s case rests entirely on circumstantial evidence (People v Hines, 120 AD2d 676), and at bar the People’s case included direct evidence of the defendant’s guilt.
¶5The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.