Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

128 Ala. 39

State v. Harold

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1900

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1900-11-15

Tried before the Hon. J. C. Richardson. ¡The appellant was tried under an indictment charging him with assault with intent to murder. He filed a plea of former conviction, setting out that he had been tried and convicted by the mayor of the town of Brewton for an assault and battery for the same acts and offenses •which were charged in the indictment.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1919

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1900-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

TYSON, J.

¶1This appeal is prosecuted 'by the State for the purpose of having reviewed the rulings'of the circuit court in bolding a certain provision of the charter of the city of Brewton constitutional.

¶2'The defendant was indicted for an assault with the intent to murder and to this indictment he pleaded former conviction by the mayor of the town of Brewton of an assault and battery included in the offense here charged. The only objection taken to this plea was, that the provision 'of the charter conferring upon the mayor all the powers and jurisdiction of a justice of the peace and concurrent jurisdiction with the county and circuit courts to try all misdemeanors known to the laws of the State of Alabama, committed within the corporate limits of said town, is. unconstitutional. It is When the act of the legislature under which' the indictment is preferred is held to be unconstitutional that the solicitor *41may take an appeal In belialf of the State to this- court. Code, § 4315.

¶3It is obvious that this appeal is not within the provisions of the statute, and must 'be dismissed. • '

¶4Appeal dismissed.

/128/ala/39 · .json · Public domain