Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 128 ARIZ 604 - State v. Druke

State v. Druke’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Warren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At a probation revocation hearing the trial court found that real party in interest had violated the regulations of his probation, but did not revoke his probation and refused to designate the previously open-ended offense a felony. The trial court’s refusal to make the designation as requested by the deputy county attorney was based on its belief that only the first six paragraphs of the form used by Pima County constitute conditions and that paragraph seven of the “Conditions and Regulations of Probation” was not a condition of probation within the meaning of the plea agreement. We do not agree. Paragraph seven requires a probationer to carry out the regulations of his probation officer and is a condition of probation. Since real party in interest failed to carry out the regulations, he violated a condition of probation.” 128 Ariz. at 605 , 627 P.2d 1102 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is the duty of the court to carry out the terms of the [plea] agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.