In Re Kramer’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
June 2001
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541
Relies on In Re Iacono · In Re Fill · In Re Heisey · In Re Velis · In Re Chasen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) Trust exemption. 1. Except as provided in paragraphs four and five of this subdivision, all property while held in trust for a judgment debtor, where the trust has been created by, or the fund so held in trust has proceeded from, a person other than the judgment debtor, is exempt from application to the satisfaction of a money judgment. 2. For purposes of this subdivision, all trusts, custodial accounts, annuities, insurance contracts, monies, assets or interests established as part of, and all payments from, either a Keogh (HR-10), retirement or other plan established by a corporation, which is qualified under section 401 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or created as a result of rollovers from such plans pursuant to sections 402(a)(5), 403(a)(4) or 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, shall be considered a trust which has been created by or which has proceeded from a person other than the judgment debtor, even though such judgment debtor is (i) a self-employed individual, (ii) a partner of the entity sponsoring the Keogh (HR-10) plan, or (iii) a shareholder of the corporation sponsoring the retirement or other plan. 3. All trusts, custodial accounts, annuities, insurance contracts, monies, assets or interests described in paragraph two of this subdivision shall be conclusively presumed to be spendthrift trusts under this section and the common law of the state of New York for all purposes, including, but not limited ”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[ujnder [ 11 U.S.C. § 522 ] an individual debtor domiciled in this state may exempt from the property of the estate, to the extent permitted by subsection (b) thereof only (i) personal ... property exempt from application to the satisfaction of money judgment under section 5205 ... of the [CPLR].... N.Y.Debt. & Cred.Law § 282 (McKinney 1990).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Taft
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.