People v. Bartges’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1971
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 126 Cal. App. 2d 763 - People v. Bartges · Isenberg v. Sherman · Markwort v. McGee · Southwestern Investment Corp. v. City of Los Angeles · 14 Cal. 2d 34 - In Re Rothrock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A mistake of fact on the part of an appellate tribunal which results in prejudicial error or a miscarriage of justice affords a proper ground for recall and correction of the remittitur [citations] ... Since the motion to dismiss the last two prior convictions was granted by the trial court and was not brought to the attention of this court prior to rendition of its decision affirming the judgments containing a finding that all three priors charged were true, we are persuaded that such decision being inadvertently rendered under a mistake of fact entitles us to take such steps as are necessary to bring into agreement the facts and the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Bartges“Motion of the District Attorney to dismiss the second and third prior convictions as alleged in the information is granted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Bartges“The judgments are modified by striking therefrom the finding of the truth of the second and third prior conviction [sic],”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Bartges
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.