128 Cal. App. 2d 92 - Raphael v. Raphael’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2018
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Raphael v. Raphael · In re Rose · Estate of Scherer · 7 Cal. 2d 712 - Murphey v. American Jewish Congress · Estate of Reinhertz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`The allowance of extraordinary fees is a matter of discretion with the trial court and is not to be interfered with on appeal except for abuse. Such discretion not only invests the trial court with the power to determine whether the character of the services is such as to warrant extra compensation, but to determine the amount.' ( Estate of Scherer, [(1943)] 58 Cal. App.2d 133, 142 [ 136 P.2d 103 ].)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no theory upon which the estate could be benefitted by the administrator's action”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cottini v. Berggren
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.